GuideNepalInvestingNEPSEDividendTaxPersonal Finance

Bonus share vs cash dividend in Nepal: which one actually builds wealth (and the 5% tax both pay)

Both bonus shares and cash dividends are taxed at 5% in Nepal — they're legally the same thing. The real difference is when you pay capital gains, and how reinvestment compounds. A Nepali investor's guide with worked examples.

Parjanya ShakyaJestha 2083 BS11 min read

Ever read a NEPSE announcement that says "Board has recommended 12% bonus + 0.6316% cash dividend" and wondered why the cash number sits at such an odd fraction? This post is for you.

The short answer: that 0.6316% is no courtesy. It is the 5% tax on the bonus shares, calculated out to the third decimal place. Bonus shares and cash dividends in Nepal are legally the same thing, and both are taxed at 5% under Section 88 of the Income Tax Act 2058. The "tax-free bonus shares" framing you may have picked up from an agent, an Indian YouTube video, or some finance reel is simply wrong for Nepal.

Once you accept that bonus and cash distributions get taxed identically at the moment of distribution, the "which builds more wealth" question shrinks to something narrower: timing, reinvestment friction, and capital gains tax deferral. That's the whole post.

The single fact most Nepali retail investors get wrong

Walk into any NEPSE chat group and you will see this claim repeated as gospel:

"Bonus share is better because there is no tax on bonus, only cash dividend has 5% tax."

That is wrong, and the Income Tax Act 2058 is very clear about why.

Section 88 requires every resident person paying a "dividend" to withhold 5% tax on the gross amount and deposit it with the Inland Revenue Department within 25 days of month-end. The Act's definition of dividend explicitly includes distributions in any form: cash, shares, or any other property. A bonus share is a distribution of retained profit in share form. Rate is the same 5%.

The myth persists because the tax on a bonus share is not deducted from your bonus shares. You do receive the full 12 bonus shares per 100 you own. But the tax is visible in the announcement itself, hiding in plain sight as the small cash dividend that always accompanies a bonus.

The math: if a company declares a 12% bonus, the tax owed is 5% of the face value (Rs 100) of those 12 bonus shares, or Rs 60 per Rs 1,000 of original holding. To fund this, the company also declares a cash dividend of 12 × 5 / 95 = 0.6316%. That cash dividend is first consumed by the 5% withholding, which is then applied to the entire grossed-up distribution. You receive the 12 bonus shares. The cash portion vanishes into the IRD account before it ever reaches your bank.

You did pay 5% tax on the bonus. It was just paid out of a cash dividend you never saw.

How to read a NEPSE dividend announcement

Once you know what to look for, every announcement decodes the same way.

AnnouncementBonus %Cash %What's actually happening
"21% bonus only"210The cash to pay the 5% withholding has to come from somewhere — usually from the company's retained cash. Rare in practice; most boards pair it with a small cash dividend.
"20% bonus + 1.0526% cash"201.0526Pure tax-cover structure. 20 × 5/95 = 1.0526. Shareholder net: 20% in shares, 0% in cash.
"10% bonus + 5.5263% cash"105.5263Tax cover (10 × 5/95 = 0.5263) plus a real 5% cash dividend on top. After the 5% withholding on cash, you receive 10% bonus shares + 4.75% net cash.
"0% bonus + 15% cash"015Pure cash dividend. After 5% withholding, you receive 14.25% net cash.
"8% bonus + 0.4211% cash"80.4211Pure tax-cover structure. 8 × 5/95 = 0.4211. Shareholder net: 8% in shares, 0% in cash.

The rule of thumb: when the cash percentage equals bonus × 5/95 (roughly 1/19 of the bonus), the entire cash component is being eaten by tax and you are receiving a pure-bonus distribution net of tax. Anything above that is genuine cash you will see in your bank.

Worked example: Rs 1 lakh in NICL at the start of the year

Time to make it concrete. Suppose on Shrawan 1 you own 200 shares of a hypothetical commercial bank at a market price of Rs 500 each, for a total holding value of Rs 1,00,000. The bank's AGM declares two scenarios. Both are economically identical from the company's perspective (same total payout from retained earnings).

Scenario A: 20% bonus + 1.0526% cash

  • Bonus shares: 200 × 20% = 40 new shares.
  • Cash declared: 200 × 100 (face value) × 1.0526% = Rs 210.53.
  • Tax withheld: 5% of 200 × 100 × (20% + 1.0526%) = 5% of Rs 4,210.53 ≈ Rs 210.53.
  • Net cash to your bank: ≈ Rs 0.
  • Net shares received: 40.
  • New holding: 240 shares. After the bonus, the market typically adjusts ex-bonus, so the price drops to roughly Rs 500 × 200 / 240 ≈ Rs 416.67.
  • New holding value (immediately after): 240 × Rs 416.67 ≈ Rs 1,00,000. Same as before.

Scenario B: 0% bonus + 20% cash

  • Cash declared: 200 × 100 × 20% = Rs 4,000.
  • Tax withheld: 5% of Rs 4,000 = Rs 200.
  • Net cash to your bank: Rs 3,800.
  • Net shares: 200 (unchanged).
  • New holding (immediately after): 200 × (Rs 500 − Rs 20 ex-dividend) = 200 × Rs 480 = Rs 96,000.
  • Total wealth: Rs 96,000 + Rs 3,800 cash = Rs 99,800.

Notice the Rs 200 shortfall in Scenario B versus Scenario A: that is the same Rs 200 of tax. It exists in both scenarios. In Scenario A it was paid out of the tax-cover cash dividend you never saw; in Scenario B it was visible because the cash itself was visible.

Net of tax, both scenarios leave you with effectively the same wealth. Bonus does not create wealth. Cash does not destroy it. The tax is identical.

So where does the actual difference come from?

Three places. Only one of them is large enough to matter for most retail investors.

1. Capital gains tax deferral (the real advantage of bonus)

Capital gains tax kicks in only when you sell. A bonus share, by contrast, is a tax-paid distribution handed to you in share form, and you can hold it indefinitely. The 5% (or 7.5%) CGT on the appreciation is deferred — possibly for years, possibly forever if you hold past your lifetime.

A cash dividend already cost you the 5% withholding, and now you have cash. Reinvest it by buying back the same shares and you have started a new holding period for the new shares; short-term gains (≤365 days) on those will be taxed at 7.5%, not 5%. Broker commission and SEBON fees come out of the new buy too.

For a long-horizon, buy-and-hold investor, the bonus's capital gains deferral is real money. To put a number on it: if a stock appreciates 15% per year and the bonus shares stay invested for 10 years, the deferred 5% CGT compounds inside the position rather than being paid annually as part of dividend re-investment friction. Roughly a 30–50 bps annual tailwind to long-term returns.

2. Reinvestment friction (smaller but real)

A cash dividend you plan to reinvest costs you:

  • Broker commission (typically 0.27–0.55% of transaction value, SEBON-published slabs).
  • SEBON regulatory fee (0.015%).
  • DP charge (Rs 25 per script per transaction).
  • Time and friction. You have to log into the broker, place the order, and have the funds sitting in your TMS account.

On small dividends (Rs 500–2,000), the DP charge alone is 1.25–5% of the dividend, which is brutal. Most retail investors with small holdings don't reinvest small cash dividends. They consume them. Bonus shares bypass the entire problem.

3. Optionality (the underrated advantage of cash)

Cash dividends give you choice:

  • Spend — if you actually live off your portfolio.
  • Reinvest in the same stock — same as a bonus, with the friction above.
  • Rebalance — buy a different stock, an FD, a mutual fund, gold. That is the move bonus shares cannot make. If your NICL position is up 80% and your portfolio is now over-weighted in financials, a cash dividend lets you redirect that capital to a sector you are underweight in.

A retired investor or a rebalancing-focused investor genuinely values cash. A 25-year-old in their first SIP year does not.

What about the cost basis when you finally sell the bonus shares?

Most retail investors trip up here. Honest answer: in Nepal, brokers and CDSC use the weighted average cost (WACC) method when computing capital gains tax at the time of sale.

A worked example:

  • You buy 100 shares at Rs 500 each. Total cost: Rs 50,000.
  • Company declares a 10% bonus. You receive 10 bonus shares.
  • You now hold 110 shares for the same Rs 50,000 total cost.
  • New cost basis per share: Rs 50,000 / 110 ≈ Rs 454.55.

At sale, the broker computes capital gains tax on (sale price − Rs 454.55) × shares sold, deducted at source via CDSC.

Here is the catch: the holding period for bonus shares starts from the date the bonus is credited to your demat, not from the original purchase date. So if you bought your original shares 18 months ago and received bonus shares last month, selling everything today means:

  • 100 shares (original): held >365 days → 5% long-term CGT.
  • 10 shares (bonus): held ≤365 days → 7.5% short-term CGT.

The broker handles the split automatically. You see the net amount in your bank.

That is why some long-term investors deliberately wait one year after the bonus credit before selling, to convert the bonus shares' CGT rate from 7.5% to 5%.

A clean framework for deciding which you prefer

Two questions, in this order.

Question 1: Would I reinvest the cash dividend in the same stock anyway?

  • Yes → Bonus shares are slightly better. Same economics, zero friction, capital gains tax deferred. You save the broker commission, the DP charge, and the time. The capital gains deferral is the real prize.
  • No, I'd consume or redirect it → Cash dividends are clearly better. Optionality is real, and a bonus share gives you nothing if you would have wanted cash.

Question 2: How long is my holding horizon?

  • >5 years (genuine buy-and-hold) → Bonus's CGT deferral compounds. Lean bonus.
  • Under 2 years (active or rebalancing) → CGT deferral barely matters. Lean cash for the optionality.

A practical heuristic for most working-age Nepali investors with a 10–30 year horizon: bonus shares are slightly better than cash dividends, but the difference is in the realm of 30–80 bps per year, not the 2–4× story that NEPSE chat groups make it out to be.

The far larger lever is whether the underlying company is good. A bad company paying generous bonuses is still a bad investment. A great company paying modest cash dividends is still a great investment.

What this looks like in your portfolio tracking

Two practical setup notes for Kharchapatra or any other tracker:

  1. Don't log bonus shares as income. They aren't. They are an adjustment to your existing holding's share count and cost basis. Logging them as income inflates your portfolio "yield" and hides the fact that the per-share value dropped ex-bonus by exactly the offsetting amount.
  2. Do log net cash dividends as income under a category like Investment Income — Dividend. That is your real cash yield. At year-end, this is also useful when reconciling against your share register: total cash dividends received should match (declared cash %) × face value × shares × 95% for each holding.

The bonus credit and ex-bonus price drop will show up automatically in your broker statement and your CDSC view. Nothing to log.

Two related reads

This post is part of the investing section of the Nepal Money Basics guide.

If a specific company's dividend announcement is confusing, especially the multi-line "X% bonus + Y% cash + Z% stock split" structures from commercial banks, write to parjanya57@gmail.com with the announcement and I will walk through the math.